“Da aN ee > oka, he Reba Pe re ee <4 OTe St ee Fr Day hablar Oat Ge Bel Se 5 hook thi, Arh k k Mody 2 te Bi hh Bebe © ye % Bry ee Ne a et eS enue ween. se al hl "> AO Dp OG, eee TO SN ANT ° Te Sekichintisece OOS Ratelny ee ae wee” hols a3 s - ; vi re tle Se RD tk Se. tate AE f 0 Tar hitk Be *s er Sf eT ns —— PR te RT a pares Sahl A ate E eth Cnt At sen gol Fate Ok tod ht Deh bed Ook See wee eet ee od Queen et tm msm hyn Faw bee Lane haysaae stein dokeaaenss neat Eee Pe ENE Sip Aveo em Anh Gidea TD, ree Tt EE MNOS eee et a nego é pha rer eT OF Te ® BLESS OR Ah She a ek Ae herte! APIO SE ee ee ee Pea ee Pe Lab oe ? , 4 3 - - ; Pane < 4 : ~ ~ ~ 3 rear - 3 2 - e < ~ “ oh ae —— —— — ee — — — a ES eS ee a a MUS. COMP. ZOOL. LIBRARY JUL 23 1970 HARVARD UNIVERSITY! POSTILLA PEABODY MUSEUM YALE UNIVERSITY NUMBER 145. 25 MAY 1970 GENERIC STATUS OF THE INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP (BIVALVIA) OF THE LATEST CRETACEOUS OF NORTH AMERICA AND EUROPE IAN G. SPEDEN POSTILLA Published by the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Postilla includes results of original research on systematic, evolution- ary, morphological, and ecological biology, including paleontology. Syntheses and other theoretical papers based on research are also welcomed. Postilla is intended primarily for papers by the staff of the Peabody Museum or on research using material in this Museum. Editors: Nancy A. Ahlstrom, Elizabeth G. Weinman, Elise K. Kenney. Postilla is published at frequent but irregular intervals. Manuscripts, orders for publications, and all correspondence concerning publications should be directed to: Publications Office Peabody Museum of Natural History New Haven, Conn., 06520, U.S.A. Lists of the publications of the Museum are available from the above office. These include Postilla, Bulletin, Discovery, special publications, and available back numbers of the discontinued journal, Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection. All except Discovery are available in exchange for relevant publications of other scientific institutions anywhere in the world. MUS. COMP. ZOOL. LIBRARY GENERIC STATUS OF THE INOCERAMUS?|TE@3 1970 ULATUS SPECIES GROUP (BIVALVIA) OF THE LATEST CRETACEOUS OF NORTH AMERIGAARD AND EUROPE UNIVERSITY: IAN G. SPEDEN New Zealand Geological Survey, Lower Hutt, New Zealand (Received February 3, 1969) ABSTRACT Five named species of the latest Cretaceous Inoceramus? tegulatus species group are, on present information, considered valid: two from North America, fibrosus (Meek and Hayden) and argenteus Conrad; three from Europe, tegulatus Hagenow, caucasicus Dobrov and dobrovi Jeletzky. The morphology of the ligament area and the pattern of muscle scars differentiate the species from Inoceramus, and Tenuipteria Stephenson is the valid generic name for the broad taxon encompassing the five species. The five species can be divided into two lineages: a lineage of equivalved species (tegulatus, fibrosus, caucasicus) and a lineage of inequivalved species (argenteus, dobrovi). The equivalved species occur in the uppermost Late Campanian, Early Maestrichtian and lowermost Late Maestrichtian, and the inequivalved species appear to be restricted to the Late Maestrichtian. Tenuipteria fibrosa and argentea are redescribed and illustrated, a neotype for argentea is designated, and a lectotype for T. tegulata is designated. POSTILLA 145: 45 p. 25 MAY 1970. 2 POSTILLA INTRODUCTION Externally similar species of Inoceramus?, characterized by relatively strong concentric and radial plicae, occur in the latest Campanian and Maestrichtian of Europe and North America. These species are included by authors in a single species group, that of Inoceramus? tegulatus Hagenow (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965). The stratigraphic range in regions of Europe and North America of the five species here accepted as valid is given in Figures 1 and 2. Species included in this group are frequently referred to in bio- stratigraphic studies and in discussions of inter-regional correlations among North America, Western Europe and Russia (Dobrov, 1951; Seitz, 1959; Jeletzky, 1962). However, because of a lack of knowl- edge of internal morphology, the generic position of I.? fibrosus (Meek and Hayden) and the other species has been uncertain (Jeletzky, 1962, p. 1014; Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965). Well-preserved specimens of /.? fibrosus from the Mobridge Mem- ber of the Pierre Shale and the overlying Fox Hills Formation in the type area of the latter in north-central South Dakota, Western In- terior of the United States (Waage, 1961, 1968), provide for the first time full details of the hinge morphology and musculation of the species. These data, together with similar data for two other mem- bers of the species group, /.? tegulatus Hagenow from Europe and Tenuipteria argentea (Conrad; Stephenson, 1955) from the Owl Creek Formation, Gulf Coast, North America, permit a reevaluation of the generic status of these species. Abbreviations used in the text and plate captions are: MMH — Mineralogisk-Geologiske Institut, Copenhagen, type specimen number NZGS—-WM — New Zealand Geological Survey, World Mollusca Collection UMMP — University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology USGS — United States Geological Survey USNM — United States National Museum YPM — Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale Univer- sity, type specimen number YPM-A_ —- — Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale Univer- sity, collection number INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Comparison of the species of the Inoceramus? tegulatus species group was facilitated through the loan of specimens, provision of in- formation and discussions by the following persons whose assistance is appreciated and gratefully acknowledged: Dr. Erle G. Kauffman, United States National Museum; Prof. K. M. Waage, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University; Dr. J. A. Jeletzky, Geological Survey of Canada; Dr. L. B. Kellum, Museum of Paleon- tology, University of Michigan; Dr. Tové Birkelund, Mineralogisk Museum, Universitetets Mineralogisk-Geologiske Institut, Copen- hagen; and Prof. Dr. O. Seitz and Dr. F. Schmid, Niedersachsisches Landesamt fur Bodenforschung, Hannover. S. N. Beatus took most of the photographs for the plates. Drs. A. Wodzicki and G. A. Challis, New Zealand Geological Survey, kindly translated parts of Polish and Russian papers. Drs. Kauffman, Waage, Birkelund, and G. R. Stevens and C. A. Fleming, New Zealand Geological Survey, read the manuscript and made valuable suggestions. Specimens of Inoceramus? fibrosa were collected and described as part of a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Yale University while the author was on leave from the New Zealand Geological Survey under a New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research National Research Fellowship. THE INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS HAGENOW SPECIES GROUP NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES Two groups of thin-shelled Inoceramus? with weak to moderately strong radial and concentric ornament have been recognized in latest Cretaceous sequences of the United States: (a) Equivalved or possibly subequivalved species with moderately inflated and weakly projecting, anteriorly situated umbones. (b) Inequivalved species with a strongly inflated left valve possessing a projecting, swollen umbone and a flattish right valve with a very slightly projecting umbone. Three names have been given to species classified in the equivalved group. All are known only from the Western Interior. 1. Inoceramus fibrosus (Meek and Hayden, 1856a). Lectotype, 4 POSTILLA by subsequent designation of Meek (1876, Pl. 17, fig. 17a), USNM 460, a steinkern of a right valve, oblique length 34.7 mm. Type locality: Forks of the Cheyenne River, South Dakota. Stratigraphic position: Pierre Shale, Early Maestrichtian. 2. Inoceramus whitii Toepelman (1922, p. 63). Location of type material unknown (see Cobban, in Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 958). Type locality: White River Badlands, South Dakota. Strati- graphic position: from the “transitional beds between the Pierre and Fox Hills” (Toepelman, 1922, p. 63), Early Maestrichtian. Jeletzky (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965) thought that this interval might be equivalent to part of the Mobridge Member, at the top of the Pierre Shale, in the Missouri Valley succession, but it could in part be equivalent to even older Pierre Shale units (Waage, 1961, 1968). 3. Inoceramus cobbani Kellum (1964, p. 1006; = radiatus Kel- lum, 1962, non Heine, 1929). Holotype, the original (and only) specimen of Kellum (1962, PI. 3, fig. 17), UMMP 37433, a left valve, length 22.9 mm. Type locality: 1924/K—6, Old Woman Creek, Niobrara County, Wyoming. Stratigraphic position: Fox Hills Sand- stone, Maestrichtian. In addition to these three named “species” Cobban (1964, p. A136) has recognized a stratigraphic succession of four forms, each with a different pattern of ornament: : . an early form with weak radial and concentric folds, a later form (typical form) in which radial folds dominate over the concentric ones, and a still later form in which radial and concentric sculpture is of about equal strength, and a final form in which the concentric sculpture dominates. The typical form of J.? fibrosus is rhomboidal in shape, has strong radial plicae and corresponds to the second group of Cobban (1964). Inoceramus cobbani Kellum is characterized by extremely weak radial ornament and stronger concentric plicae, and could be classed in Cobban’s group four. Jeletzky, in one of his important studies of the North American species of the /.? tegulatus species group (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 958), noted that “representatives of J. whitii always occur in association and appear to intergrade with the more typical repre- sentatives of Inoceramus? tegulatus” (= fibrosus, according to Jeletzky). He considered whitii to be an extreme morphological vari- INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 5 ant of the one “‘polytypic species”. Jeletzky also placed cobbani (= radiatus) in synonymy with whitii. Populations of /.? fibrosus from all biostratigraphic zones of the Fox Hills Formation in its type area are extremely variable in shape and ornament. Individual specimens from populations of fibrosus match exactly the specimen of cobbani figured by Kellum (1962, Pl. 3, fig. 17). The same applies to whitii which, on the basis of Toepelman’s description, is indistinguishable from the Fox Hills species. Specimens with strong radial ornament (fibrosus sensu stricto) occur in populations from all stratigraphic zones in the Fox Hills Formation but are more common in the underlying Mobridge Member of the Pierre Shale. Future detailed statistically based studies on adequate samples from various horizons may prove the existence of successive sub- species. Until this type of study is undertaken the information avail- able suggests that only one morphologically variable species, for which the name fibrosus has priority, should be recognized in the uppermost Cretaceous of the Western Interior of the United States and Canada. This procedure is accepted for the purpose of this paper. Two species of inequivalved, radially plicate Inoceramus? have been described from the Maestrichtian of the Gulf Coast of the United States (Fig. 2). 1. Inoceramus argenteus Conrad (1858, p. 329). Type specimen lost (Stephenson, 1955, p. 111; Richards, 1968). Type locality: Owl Creek, Tippah County, Mississippi. Stratigraphic position: Owl Creek Formation, Maestrichtian. 2. Inoceramus costellatus Conrad (1858, p. 329). Other data as for I. argenteus. Stephenson (1955, p. 111) synonymized costellatus under argen- teus but did not discuss the reasons for this step. As Conrad de- scribed argenteus first on page 329, Stephenson probably used the argument of page priority. Conrad’s (1858) illustrations do not permit positive conspecific identity of the two specimens. The figure of argenteus is poor and shows an incomplete left valve apparently marked only by fine concentric plicae. His figure of costellatus (1858, Pl. 34, fig. 12) is good and shows an inequivalved specimen with strong radial and concentric plicae on the right valve. Conrad re- corded the presence of an inoceramid hinge on the specimen. Con- 6 POSTILLA sequently it would have been better to select costellatus as the valid name of the species. Stephenson (1955) separated argenteus from Inoceramus, largely on the basis of its possession of a narrow ligament area bearing only a few (5 to 6) shallow ligament pits of irregular width, spacing and impression, and made it the type species of a new genus Tenuipteria. The status of this taxon is discussed in a later section. EUROPEAN SPECIES Three species and eight varieties of small, thin-shelled Inoceramus closely resembling /.? tegulatus Hagenow and fibrosus (Meek and Hayden) have been named from latest Cretaceous sequences of an area extending from Western Europe to the Caucasus. 1. Inoceramus tegulatus Hagenow (1842, p. 559). Lectotype, here designated, the original of Wolansky (1932, Pl. 5, fig. 6), an almost complete left valve in the original collection studied by von Hagenow, in the Geological-Paleontological Institute, University of Griefswald, East Germany. Type locality: Riigen Island, East Ger- many. Stratigraphic position: Mukronatenkreide, Lower Mae- strichtian (Wolansky, 1932; Nestler, 1965). 2. Inoceramus caucasicus Dobrov (1951, p. 167). Holotype, by original designation, specimen no. 12 of Dobrov (1951, Pl. 2, fig. 2), bivalved, height 35 mm, length of ligament area 17 mm. Type lo- cality: Dobrun Zolka River, Northern Caucasus. Stratigraphic posi- tion: Maestrichtian (Mst. s,). (Specimen in the Geological Cabinet of Moscow State University.) 3. Inoceramus dobrovi Jeletzky (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 956). Holotype, by original designation of Jeletzky (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 956), the original of Dobrov (1951, Pl. 2, figs. la-c), a complete bivalved specimen, length 37 mm, height 30 mm. Type locality: Darya River, Northern Caucasus. Stratigraphic posi- tion: Maestrichtian (Mst. s.). (Specimen in the Geological Cabinet of Moscow State University.) Dobroy (1951) also proposed eight new varieties, three under his concept of regulatus Hagenow and five under his concept of cauca- sicus Dobrov, namely: I. tegulatus Hagenow var. gibbera Dobrov !. tegulatus Hagenow var. undulato-sulcata Dobrov I. tegulatus Hagenow var. curta Dobrov INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 7 . caucasicus Dobrov var. monilifera Dobrov . caucasicus Dobrov var. cabardinica Dobrov . caucasicus Dobrovy var. fluctuosa Dobrov . caucasicus Dobrov var. fistulata Dobrov I. caucasicus Dobrov var. ravni Dobrov Hagenow (1842, p. 559) did not illustrate any of his specimens of tegulatus. A translation of his brief description follows: La a 6) I. tegulatus n. The present very damaged 10 examples allow only a general comparison to the former similar species [refers to I. mytiloides Mantell, a species described directly before], and both valves appear to be symmetrical and moderately strongly inflated. Just as in the case of J. mytiloides growth ridges are crossed by 14 to 18 radiating furrows which have a sharper base, among which 3—4 are always more prominently impressed. The generally equally broad and flat raised intervals resemble a row of overhanging flat roof-tiles with a somewhat convex front margin. The last part of the first sentence of Hagenow’s description makes it almost certain that he was studying an equivalved species. This interpretation is supported by Wolansky’s (1932, p. 28—29) revision of the original collection of von Hagenow. Her statement (p. 29) “Der Angabe 6dums, dass die rechte Klappe kleiner sei als die linke und keinen vorspringenden Wirbel besitze, kann ich nicht folgen, da mir auch solche Schalen mit kraftig ausgepragtem Wirbel vorliegen” indicates a similar degree of projection of the umbones of both valves. Although Wolansky says the right valve has a strongly pro- jecting umbone, her illustrations (PI. 4, fig. 4; Pl. 5. figs. 5, 6), while not good, especially for the left valve, clearly show, as noted by Jeletzky (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 956), that Hagenow’s species is equivalved and has similar moderately inflated and slightly projecting umbones on each valve. Wolansky (p. 34) synonymized in tegulatus the specimens classified as mytiloides by von Hagenow. Prior to Wolansky’s (1932) restudy of Hagenow’s original collec- tion, @dum (1922, p. 10) examined specimens from the “White Chalk of Denmark” and defined /. tegulatus Hagenow: The main characteristics of Inoceramus tegulatus are as fol- lows: the long anterodorsal angle, the considerable difference in convexity of the right and left valves, the radial ribs and the small ear formed by the long anterodorsal angle. To these 8 POSTILLA features may be added the absence of small pits in the ligament area. (Translation by New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.) In his detailed description @dum stressed the inequivalveness and the presence of a strongly inflated and projecting umbone on the left valve and a small very weakly projecting umbone on the right valve. The few specimens and illustrations available to the writer suggest that the umbone of the right valve is less prominent than that on Hagenow’s specimens (see also Jeletzky, in Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 956). Seitz (1959, p. 123-124) was the first to point out the existence of two concepts for J. tegulatus: an equivalved “Avicula-like” J. tegula- tus Hagenow (see PI. 2, figs. 1-3) and an inequivalved ““Pholadomya- like” I. tegulatus Hagenow of @dum (see PI. 2, figs. 4-6). Jeletzky (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965) later fully documented the differences between the two species and renamed @dum’s species concept as I. dobrovi Jeletzky, but he selected the holotype for his new species from a suite of Caucasian specimens described and illustrated by Dobrov (1951). Seitz also considered there to be a possible difference in ornament between fegulatus Hagenow and dobrovi Jeletzky. Specimens of the two species sent to the writer by Dr. Tové Birkelund tend to confirm Seitz’ observation. J. dobrovi appears to have consistently finer and more regular concentric plicae and more regular radial plicae that are restricted to the anterior half of the valve, whereas the broad posterior wing has regular concentric growth lamellae only. As stressed by Seitz (1959, p. 124), additional well-preserved and accurately identified specimens are required to clarify the apparent differences in ornament and to document more adequately other pos- sible morphological differences, especially of the form of the anterior ear of the left valve and of the ligament area of I. dobrovi. Differences in the prominence of the umbone and the form of the anterior ear of valves figured by @dum (1922) and my knowledge of these features on the North American J.? fibrosus led me to suspect that Odum may have studied specimens of both tegulatus Hagenow and dobrovi Jeletzky. My suspicion was confirmed independently by the observations of Birkelund, who commented (letter of January 15, 1966): In @dum’s paper both /.? tegulatus v. Hag. (fig. 4, 5, 6) from the Lower Maastrichtian and /.? dobrovi Jeletzky (fig. 1, 2, 3, 7) INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 9 from the Upper Maastrichtian are figured. @dum (1922) did not mention any differences between the specimens he examined from the Lower and Upper Maastrichtian of Denmark and Jeletzky (in his 1965 paper) did not realize that Odum figured both the so-called /.? dobrovi and the real J.? tegulatus v. Hag. The nonrecognition by Jeletzky of the mixture of species studied by @dum does not affect in any way Jeletzky’s conclusions of the validity of the two species. The third European species, J. caucasicus Dobrov, was named by Dobrov during his study of the J. tegulatus species group in the uppermost Cretaceous of the Caucasus. Dobrov recognized two species: J. caucasicus in the upper Lower and lower Upper Mae- strichtian (Mst. s,; upper marl) and J. tegulatus Hagenow in the upper Upper Maestrichtian (Mst. s.; limestone). Dobrov’s text and illustrations prove conclusively that he followed @dum’s concept of I. tegulatus, and I agree with Jeletzky (in Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965) in accepting the J. tegulatus Hagenow of Dobrov as con- specific with J. dobrovi Jeletzky. The varieties of J. tegulatus and dobrovi proposed by Dobrov (1951), some of which apparently occur together, are here believed to be extreme morphological variants of their respective species. Inoceramus caucasicus Dobrov includes specimens with strong con- centrics but with very weak radials (holotype of caucasicus) to those with very strong radial plicae (caucasicus var. fistulosa). The latter closely resemble the holotype of /.? fibrosus. Specimens of I. dobrovi Jeletzky (= the tegulatus of Dobrov) show a comparable range of ornament, i.e., weak radials (tegulatus var. gibbera of Dobrov) to strong radials (tegulatus var. undulato-sulcata of Dob- rov). To summarize: As in North America, two species occur in the latest Cretaceous: an equivalved species with moderately inflated and projecting umbones, distinct anterior ears, and similar ornament on each valve (/.? tegulatus Hagenow), and an inequivalved species with a strongly inflated and projecting umbone on the left valve and an almost flat right valve on which the umbone barely projects above the dorsal margin (J.? dobrovi Jeletzky). The problems of whether /.? caucasicus and 1I.? tegulatus are synonymous or distinct subspecies and the status of the varieties of Dobrov require a statistical study of stratigraphically located samples of adequate numbers of specimens, as suggested above for the North American /.? fibrosus. The holotype of caucasicus has strong con- 10 POSTILLA centrics and weak radials, whereas the lectotype of tegulatus has strong radial and concentric plicae. Evidence of successive popula- tions dominated by different ornament types would favor the possi- bility of different subspecies or species. Because of past confusion in the concept of the species, specimens recorded in the literature as J. tegulatus should be reexamined to de- termine whether they are tegulatus (sensu stricto) or dobrovi. GENERIC POSITION OF THE SPECIES OF THE INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP The generic position of the species of the J.? tegulatus species group has been uncertain from the date they were proposed, in part be- cause of the pteriid-like shape and presence of a distinct anterior ear, largely because of our lack of knowledge of the internal mor- phology of the species. Jnoceramus? fibrosus has been classified in Avicula Lamarck, Pholadomya G. B. Sowerby, Pinna Linnaeus, Pteria Scopoli, Pseudoptera Meek, Inoceramus J. Sowerby, Actino- ceramus Meek, and Tardinacara Elias (nomen nudum) — Inocera- mus being the most frequently used (see Jeletzky, 1962). Inocera- mus? tegulatus Hagenow has been placed under Inoceramus and Spyridoceramus Heinz (1932). Inoceramus? fibrosus (Meek and Hayden) from the type area of the Fox Hills Formation has a ligament area that is longitudinally striated, with a few irregular depressions crossing the area under the umbone, but lacking the regular incised ligament pits character- istic of Inoceramus (PI. 1, figs. 1, 3). The specimens also bear a dis- tinctive pattern of muscle scars. The true tegulatus Hagenow of Odum (1922, figs. 4-6; Pl. 2, fig. 2) has a similar ligament area, but some specimens (Odum, fig. 6) have small, faint, irregular pits along part of the ligament area similar to but less distinct and regular than those on the ligament area of species of the I. barabini group from the Pierre Shale (see p. 31). Dr. Birkelund (letter of February 7, 1966) has informed me that @dum’s specimen with the ligament pits is “stratigraphically older than the specimens from Alborg” which have no pits. Consequently, the degree of impression and regularity of the pits probably degenerated during the late Cam- panian-early Maestrichtian. Although the musculation of tegulatus Hagenow is unknown, and although some doubt may exist as to the degree to which weak INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 11 ligament pits are present on the ligament area, the similarity of the ligament areas and of external morphology make it reasonably certain that fibrosus and tegulatus are congeneric. The ligament area and musculation of caucasicus were not observed by Dobrov. How- ever, because of its close external similarity and approximate time equivalence with regulatus, I tentatively accept caucasicus as con- generic with fibrosus and tegulatus. The musculation of the inequivalved species argenteus Stephen- son and dobrovi are unknown. The ligament area of argenteus has two to six shallow irregular pits as described by Stephenson (1955); that of dobrovi is unknown. Except for the inequivalveness, and the presence of irregular weak pits crossing the ligament area, argenteus is closely similar to tegulatus and fibrosus and is here considered congeneric with them under the broad generic diagnosis given below. Because of its close external similarity to, and approximate strati- graphic equivalence with argenteus, dobrovi is here tentatively con- sidered congeneric with argenteus. The lack of incised regular ligament pits crossing the full width of the ligament area and the presence of a distinctive pattern of muscle scars clearly separate the regulatus species group from Ino- ceramus J. Sowerby, as defined by the type species J. cuvierii J. Sowerby (1814) (Cox, 1955). Three names are available for the generic taxon to include tegu- latus Hagenow, fibrosus (Meek and Hayden), argenteus Conrad, and probably the other two species also: Tardinacara Elias (1931, opp. p. 58, p. 122, 130), Spyridoceramus Heinz (1932, p. 19) and Tenuipteria Stephenson (1955). Tardinacara was proposed by Elias (1931, p. 130) in the form “|. Inoceramus fibrosus Meek & Hayden (Tardinacara [Pseudop- tera] fibrosa of the writer)...” and was not accompanied by a diag- nosis or use of the words new genus or type. As stated by Jeletsky (in Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 955) it is a nomen nudum. Spyridoceramus Heinz was proposed as follows: “Spyridoceramus Nov. gen. Genotyp: Inoceramus tegulatus HAG. Die systematische Stellung dieser Gattung ist noch ungewiss.” There was no diagnosis, discussion or illustration, and it is not certain which concept of I. tegulatus Hagenow, the equivalved or inequi- valved, was meant by Heinz. As @dum’s (1922) description was 12 POSTILLA relatively recent and superior to earlier descriptions, Heinz may have accepted the concept of an inequivalved J. tegulatus Hagenow (= I.? dobrovi). Heinz’ name Spyridoceramus is invalid (Article 12, International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, adopted by the 15th International Zoological Congress with later minor amendments (Stoll et al., 1964)), as has been recognized by Vokes (1967, p. 171), even though Heinz selected a type species and obeyed the rules operative prior to 1931. Other workers have accepted (Aliev, 1958) or validated (Seitz, 1961) names proposed by Heinz (1932). However, as recommended by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature (1950, Bull. Zool. Nomenclature, v. 14, p. 563, paragraph 48), the validation of nomina nuda or invalid names may cause confusion and should be avoided. Tenuipteria Stephenson 1955 is a valid name and is here applied to the five species discussed above. A diagnosis and discussion of my concept of the genus is given in the systematic section of this paper. ADDENDUM. In the recently published Part N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia, of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (R. C. Moore, ed., Geo- logical Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 1969), a copy of which was received while this paper was in galley proof, the generic taxon Spyridoceramus Cox, new genus, was validated (p. N320) by the late Dr. L. R. Cox, who noted that “Jnoceramus argenteus Conrad is the North American representative of this genus” and placed the genus in the Inoceramidae. On page N310 Cox ac- cepted the genus Tenuipteria Stephenson, 1955, with Inoceramus argenteus as type species, and classed it in the Bakevelliidae. If argenteus and tegulatus are considered conspecific, as clearly held by Dr. Cox and by myself in this paper, Tenuipteria has priority and is the valid name for the generic taxon. Future studies may per- mit the application of the name Spyridoceramus to an equivalved generic or subgeneric taxon. BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION EUROPE In Europe the species of Tenuipteria are recorded from the latest Campanian and Maestrichtian of the Russian Platform, northern INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 13 Poland, northern East and West Germany, Sweden and Denmark. The species are restricted to the Boreal Province (Jeletzky, 1948, 1951; Naidin, 1954; Kongiel, 1962). Biostratigraphic subdivision of the latest Campanian and Mae- strichtian of Europe has been based on many phyla and classes of organisms. Up to seven zones have been recognized in the Mae- strichtian (Troelsen, 1937; see Birkelund, 1957, table 4). Belemnoids are of primary importance for zonation, and two (Naidin, 1952; Maslakova, 1959; Moskvin, 1962), three (Kongiel, 1962), four (Birkelund, 1957; Jeletzky, 1951) or five (Jeletzky, 1958, 1962; Naidin, 1960) zones are accepted. The controversy over the identification and nomenclature of belemnoid species important for the zonation of the European Maestrichtian (Kongiel, 1962, p. 23; Birkelund, 1965, p. 153), the diversity of proposed zonations, and the overlapping range zones of many belemnoid species (Kongiel, 1962, tables 6, 7; Birkelund, 1957, table 4) raise doubt as to the validity of the standard zonation and proposed correlations between sections (see also Wood, 1967), and are perhaps responsible for the difficulties encountered in decid- ing the position of the Campanian-Maestrichtian boundary (Birke- lund, 1957) and of boundaries within the Maestrichtian (Ebens- berger, 1962, p. 9). As most workers have employed a fourfold sub- division of the Maestrichtian, it is here accepted as a framework to which can be related the ranges of the European species of the Tenuipteria tegulata species group. The stratigraphic range of the species of Tenuipteria in important areas is given in Figure 1. For four reasons this table should be interpreted with caution: Firstly, caucasica Dobrov is treated as distinct from fegulata Hagenow, although future systematic work may show them to be conspecific. Secondly, in the absence of illustrations the specific status of spec- imens listed as tegulata by many authors is uncertain. These records are treated as tegulata (sensu lato) but may include equivalved tegulata or caucasica and/or the inequivalved dobrovi. Thirdly, the belemnoid zones of Northwest Europe and Russia are taken as approximately time equivalent. This is probably only partly true, for in Russia Jeletzky (1958; 1962, p. 1013) considers the zone of Belemnella kasimirovensis to include some of the “latest lower Maestrichtian” and the zone of Belemnella lanceolata to ex- tend down into the uppermost Campanian. T 5 ae | =. ao aa = = “=k ar, a ie = = | ] < 8 | windo0)dAjod 3 5 = S iaduD| Djjauwajag we 3| 0 & sy i sosar0yvoAu1sog | & | M |Zp 2 a N74 8 mil ze = i — — = = } 1 | | | | 9 8 D)D/0aDuD| D}Dj0a2uD| g 5 | S| Djjauwajag Djjauwajag ® a | | ~ | | a - 3 ee j O —~-4-# + ---/- =| —,_- i 7 +3 | | soiunt 9 m) ys) | | mipssibieG sisuawns 2 8 5 = | 3 Ho | D)D/0aDuD| 3 > 3 | > o toad — ———<—<————— nd | | | 9 < te es o>qwid Pieuel sa € o rE Ball is} eat | 5 S S Ry Djjauwajag = all my tt =| = = _ = ve a— | ——— + = —S an SS a o > ees 2 a S at = = = uv =| | o | So a a | 3 5 em soiunt soiunf{ = a z > = & re | fas o Djjaiuwajag Djjajiuwajag Z re 3 a | Z| hm o | o 8 ay = age 8 Q | 3 ze g (S SS S -~ | 5 2 — uv is = — Ss + = = 7) — —|' —Bia- — Jt ——— 5 2 0 “4 oe 5 = a 1 a oy 1 g a S ma m a x — = _ ina <4 | c oa Zz ~~ is} Il ~ — | 3° | | 5s ¢c — } co a Key | = | | (oy c 3 Sr = | | SISUBAOJIWISDY SISUBAOJIWIISOH AY o = jae | Dj jauwajag Djjauwajag rZ e |< ° j | | Ly } = | | | | | ——- t —_—+ r —}+— — i t — — —_—_— — +— —_—} =F | 961 | | | | | -SO[ | | | | ; as abe aN el | | saded siya 7961 ‘0961 | S4ay20 pure $961 ‘Pun|axaig A A 4 | IV “6561 /6S61 | cg *A0190q 5961 C96 0961 |0961) ‘BEG! £561 ‘wNPB! 6561 ‘2319S | ‘S961 ‘7961 | BS6l ‘Ayz19/9f | *1S61 ‘A4Z29/9F ‘0961 ‘A4z29/9/ *RAOHRISELY g A01G0Q | ‘AyNZIIIaL ‘yysuljsai>y | ‘iysAuezog ‘yz 19 | 6561 ‘UIPIEN | | | | | be | } cf Ab Re | piouwajeg plouowwy — atk Sel 4 = ssh ~~ ~ —) = — —— ==> = a <— aes Ve W4o;elg | } waWida @snswonvd | * eld GNv10d | N3GaMS |ANWW¥a9| 3dO¥NS | SINOZ DIHdVYDILVYLSOIS ueissny NYslsSam = _ — = 4 - ~ — _ INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 15 Fourthly, in relating the threefold belemnoid zonation of the Lower Maestrichtian to the twofold zonation, the zone of B. lanceo- lata is taken to be equivalent to the Lower Lower Maestrichtian and the other two zones to the Upper Lower Maestrichtian. This does not correspond to the proportions shown by Jeletzky in tables accompanying his papers of 1958, 1960 and 1962. Figure | suggests three patterns: 1. In both Northwest Europe and Russia older equivalved species (tegulata-caucasica; upper Campanian to lowermost Upper Mae- trichtian) are followed by a younger inequivalved species (dobrovi; Upper Maestrichtian). 2. The equivalved species appears earlier in Russia (caucasica), in the zone of Bostrychoceras polyplocum (Maslakova, 1959), than in Europe (tegulata; Seitz, 1959), whereas the inequivalved species appears to have similar stratigraphic ranges in both regions. 3. The equivalved tegulata may extend into younger rocks in Northwest Europe than the equivalent caucasica in Russia, where caucasica probably did not continue to the top of the Lower Mae- strichtian (Jeletzky, 1960, p. 1013; Dobrov and Pavlova, 1959). However, it should be noted that Dobrov (1951) originally recorded caucasica in the uppermost Lower Maestrichtian (Mst. i.) and lower- most Upper Maestrichtian (Mst. s,). Dr. Friedrich Schmid (letter of September 27, 1966) has recently collected a poorly preserved specimen identified as /. tegulatus from the beds outcropping at Hemmoor at some 50 to 60 meters above the “Tonband” (Schmid, 1955, fig. 1). If the specimen is an equi- valved tegulata Hagenow, this discovery represents a significant increase in the upward stratigraphic range of the species and places it well within the lower Upper Maestrichtian zone of Belemnitella junior. If further systematic and biostratigraphic studies support these patterns, then the equivalved species (as caucasica) may have evolved on the Russian Platform, spreading later to Northwest Europe, and possibly becoming morphologically distinct (as tegulata) in the pro- cess. In this case the inequivalved dobrovi possibly also evolved on the Russian Platform but spread more rapidly to Northwest Europe. FIG. 1. Stratigraphic distribution of the species of the Tenuipteria tegulata species group in the Upper Cretaceous of Europe. Note: T. tegulata (sensu lato) may include equivalved (tegulata, caucasica) and/or the inequivalved (dobrovi) species. 16 POSTILLA NORTH AMERICA In North America species of Tenuipteria are recorded from the Maestrichtian of the Gulf Coast and the Western Interior of the United States and Canada. Until recently the epicontinental upper- most Cretaceous sea of the Western Interior was considered to open to the south (and doubtfully to the north) (Reeside, 1957; Hattin, 1967). Gill and Cobban (1966) and Birkelund (1965, fig. 125) have shown that the sea also opened to the north into the boreal ocean. Two faunal provinces can be recognized. There is a Western In- terior province, including central Canada, with faunas dominated by baculitid and scaphitid ammonoids and bivalves; this province has affinities with the Boreal Province (Birkelund, 1965). And there is a Gulf Coast province with faunas characterized by different families and species of bivalves, a more diverse gastropod fauna (Sohl, 1964) and sparse cephalopods. Because of the incomplete systematic coverage of phyla in one or both regions, documentation of the definitive characteristics of the provinces is at present in- adequate. Biostratigraphic zonation of the upper Campanian and Maestricht- ian of the Western Interior is based principally on baculitid and scaphitid ammonoids (Cobban and Reeside, 1952; Jeletzky, 1962; Gill and Cobban, 1966), although zonation of the upper part of the section equivalent to the Fox Hills Formation is hampered by a lack of systematic work on the scaphite ammonoids (Waage, 1968). The Gulf Coast sequence is zoned at a grosser level by oysters (Sohl and Kauffman, 1964), gastropods (Sohl, 1960, 1964), and other molluscs (Stephenson et al., 1942). Cephalopods are uncommon and of limited importance. Zonation of the Western Interior and Gulf Coast sequences is complicated by the occurrence of nonmarine beds at the top of the Cretaceous and by stratigraphic breaks, re- spectively. Consequently, the range of species and zones based on marine organisms is likely to be incomplete. Correlation of North American sequences is given in Figure 2. Correlation between the Western Interior and the Gulf Coast is com- plicated by a paucity of common taxa (Waage, 1968) and depends largely on the work of Jeletzky (1960), who argues that the Scaphites (Discoscaphites) nebrascensis zone of Fox Hills Formation in its type area is approximately isochronous with the S. (D.) conradi zone of the Prairie Bluff Chalk. Because of the close similarity of their INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 17 faunas, correlation between the Western Interior and south-central Canada is good. Figure 2 also shows the stratigraphic range of the North American species of Tenuipteria. The short range zone of T. fibrosa in south- central Canada is undoubtedly due to the change from marine to nonmarine deposition. Tenuipteria argentea is known only from the Owl Creek and Prairie Bluff formations of northern Mississippi and southeastern Missouri. As these formations have unconformable lower and upper limits, the stratigraphic range of the species may have been much longer, a view supported by Sohl (1964, p. 155) who considers that a “moderate part of the Maestrichtian is missing.” No radially ribbed, equivalved, mytiloid-shaped Jnoceramus with relatively weak plicae which re- sembles T. fibrosa has been reported from the older units of the Navarro Group. A large subcircular right valve from the Nacatoch Sand, recorded as “7. vanuxemi Meek & Hayden?” by Stephenson (1941, Pl. 13, fig. 3), has strong, widely spaced, narrow concentric plicae, and fine, weak radial plicae. As the left valve holotype (Meek, 1876, Pl. 14, figs. 2a,b) and right valves studied by Meek (1876, p. 57) lack radial plicae, Stephenson’s specimen should be reeval- uated. In contrast to the situation in Europe, no succession of an equi- valved species followed by an inequivalved species has been recog- nized in any one region of North America. This may be largely due to the incompleteness of sequences and the onset of nonmarine deposition. If, as proposed by Jeletzky (1960), the Fox Hills Forma- tion in its type area and the Prairie Bluff Chalk are correlatives, then argentea and fibrosa could have overlapping ranges much as tegulata and dobrovi overlap in the lower part of the Upper Mae- strichtian Belemnitella junior zone of Northwest Europe (fig. 1). CORRELATION BETWEEN THE LATEST CRETACEOUS OF EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA Correlations between the latest Cretaceous sequences of Europe and North America have been based on scaphitid and sphenodiscid am- monoids, belemnoids, and the bivalve genus “Jnoceramus’” (Seitz, 1959; Jeletzky, 1960, 1962; Birkelund, 1965; Waage, 1968). Only Cobban and Reeside (1952) and Jeletzky (1960, 1962) have pro- posed correlations at the intrastage level. dNOYSD VW1AS N ° ] o ° eh a) Cv > o > i=} a a la) Cc 5 NVILHDIYLS AWW ¥961 “4NG B SWELIIIAA 7961 ‘0961 ‘A¥Z3219f 9961 ‘UEQGOD 8 II'D ‘0961 “14S VOVNVD IWYLNID-HLNOS YOISLNI NYdlSaM IsVOD 41ND INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 19 Cobban and Reeside (1952, p. 1026) did not document their statement that “the Fox Hills fauna corresponds to the upper Mae- strichtian fauna of the European sequence”. They seem to have accepted the correlation given by Stephenson and Reeside (1938, fig. 3). Jeletzky argued that the S. (Discoscaphites) nebrascensis zone of the type Fox Hills Formation and its equivalents in Texas and north- ern Mexico are Upper Lower Maestrichtian (upper part of the Belemnella cimbrica zone) (1960, fig. 2), and the Triceratops beds are of late Maestrichtian age (equal to part or all of the Belemnitella junior and Belemnella kasimirovensis zones of northern Europe). The possibility of a basal Upper Maestrichtian age for the upper- most marine Cretaceous of the Western Interior was not excluded by Jeletzky. In fact, in his text-figures (1962, text-figs. 1, 2) he extended the youngest Fox Hills Formation well into the range zone of Belem- nitella junior (lower Upper Maestrichtian). Considerable doubt exists as to the position of the base of the Maestrichtian Stage in the Western Interior sequences. Most workers follow Jeletzky (in Cobban and Reeside, 1952, p. 1026-1027) in tentatively placing the lower boundary of the stage at the base of the zone of Baculites baculus. On the evidence of the ammonites the boundary could be placed either at the base of the B. baculus zone or possibly within or at the top of the zone. Jeletzky favored the first alternative, emphasizing the appearance of certain European Lower Maestrichtian scaphitid species even though late Campanian Euro- pean species are also present in the zone of B. baculus and other typical European Lower Maestrichtian species appear high in or above the B. baculus zone. Doubt about the stratigraphic ranges of many of the North American ammonoid species, and lack of docu- mentation that the North American and European species discussed by Jeletzky are conspecific (Birkelund, 1965; Waage, 1968) increase the uncertainties of the proposed correlations between the regions. Similarly, the position of the boundary between the Lower and Upper Maestrichtian in the Western Interior is uncertain. Most workers accept Jeletzky’s (1962, p. 1008) selection of the upper limit as the top of the range zone of Discoscaphites nebrascensis. Jeletzky (1960, 1962) placed a lot of weight for an upper Lower Maestrichtian age for the type Fox Hills Formation on his discovery FIG. 2. Stratigraphic distribution of the species of the Tenuipteria tegulata species group in the Upper Cretaceous of North America. 20 POSTILLA at Hemmoor of an ammonoid fragment which he identified as S. (H.) nicolleti. Both Birkelund (1965) and Waage (1968) consider the fragment indeterminable. Waage goes further in showing it to be morphologically distinct from the true nicolleti of the Western Inte- rior. After an analysis of the belemnoids, scaphitids and sphenodis- cids, Waage concludes that an inadequate knowledge of the system- atics, biostratigraphy, paleoecology and paleogeography of these taxa in both Europe and North America prevents refined correlations between the two regions. Of the cephalopods he emphasizes the potential value of hoploscaphitid ammonoids for correlation at the intrastage level (see also Birkelund, 1966). The stratigraphic distribution of the species of Tenuipteria in Europe and North America tends to support Jeletzky’s correlations. The equivalved species appear about the same time, latest Cam- panian, in both regions—at least in Russia and south-central Canada if the specimen of fibrosa from some 80 feet below the Belanger Sandstone Member of the Bearpaw Formation (Furnival, 1946, p. 62), and hence probably below the zone of Baculites baculus, is correctly identified. The absence of an inequivalved species of Tenuipteria in the Western Interior of the United States and Canada, together with the lack of other index taxa, counts against the pres- ence of Upper Maestrichtian marine beds. Likewise, the occurrence of the inequivalved 7. argentea in the Prairie Bluff Chalk of the Gulf Coast is compatible with a correlation with the latest Lower Mae- strichtian and earliest Upper Maestrichtian. However, the present inadequate knowledge of the systematics, biostratigraphy and paleogeography of the species of Tenuipteria, coupled with the uncertain status of European latest Cretaceous bio- stratigraphy, negates the possibility of precise correlations. Theoret- ically, the species need not have isochronous range zones in Europe FIG, 3. Muscle scar and pallial line impressions for inoceramid species from the uppermost Cretaceous of the Western Interior of the United States. 3a. Tenuipteria fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). YPM 24037, drawn from the original of Plate 1, figure 5. The dashed line indicates the position of edge of the inner shell layer. 3b. “Inoceramus”’ barabini Morton. YPM 24052, Pierre Shale, Converse County, Wyoming, C. E. Beecher and J. B. Hatcher, collectors. 3c. “Endocostea” typica Whitfield. YPM 24053, Pierre Shale, Converse County, Wyoming. e s : o = =~ = ~ 22 POSTILLA and North America. Assuming that caucasica and tegulatus are con- specific, and that the correlations are correct, the nonisochroneity of some range zones would be well documented by the appearance of caucasica in Russia before the entry of tegulatus in Western Europe —a difference equivalent to the range zone of Belemnitella lanceolata (Fig. 1). Even if species are able to spread geographically in a geo- logically insignificant time interval, the evolution of a species in a region may involve at least half a million years (Gill and Cobban, 1966), and the migration and establishment of a species may be prevented by environmental, biological (Briggs, 1967), geological or hydrographic factors. For example, the later appearance of an equivalved species of Tenuipteria in Western Europe may be due largely to environmental control. Until detailed systematic and bio- stratigraphic studies are completed these arguments tend to be se- mantic. Possibly the best evidence for the correlation of the Western Inte- rior sequence comes from the assessment of biostratigraphy and potassium-argon ages prepared by Gill and Cobban (1966, p. 34— 37). These authors demonstrate that the base of the Baculites baculus Range Zone, which is correlated with the base of the Lower Mae- strichtian, is at about 70 million years, and that the Discoscaphites nebrascensis Range Zone is older than 66 + 2 million years and estimated to be about 68 million years. Although these dates give a reasonably good fix for the Western Interior sequence and tend to place the youngest marine Cretaceous of the Western Interior in the latest Lower Maestrichtian, correlation with the European stages remains dependent on classical biostratigraphic methods. Refined correlation is not possible until radiometric ages are available for European sequences. SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTIONS Tenuipteria Stephenson 1955 Emend. SYNONYMY. Tardinacara Elias, 1931, opp. p. 58, p. 122, 130 (nomen nudum). Spyridoceramus Heinz, 1932, p. 19 (invalid, no diagnosis). TYPE SPECIES. By original designation of Stephenson (1955, p. 110), INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 23 Inoceramus argenteus Conrad (1958, p. 329), Owl Creek Formation, Maestrichtian, Gulf Coast, North America. DIAGNOSIS. Thin-shelled inoceramid characterized by radial and concentric plicae, a distinct small anterior auricle and a narrow liga- ment area, concave in cross section, longitudinally striated, either lacking ligament pits (fibrosa, the stratigraphically younger tegulata) or with faint, broad, irregular, weakly impressed pits (stratigraphi- cally older tegulata, argentea). Muscle scars consist of a posteroven- trally situated large adductor scar and two anterodorsal byssal-pedal scars which are joined by a pallial line of discrete scars anterodorsally but fused ventrally (fibrosa). EMENDED DESCRIPTION. Equivalved or inequivalved, when the left valve is the more strongly inflated, small to medium sized with a distinct anterior ear, usually delimited from the main disc of the shell, and a flattened, rounded, posterior dorsal margin. Umbones anterior, moderately projecting on equivalved species, strongly pro- jecting on the left valve but only slightly projecting on the right valve of inequivalved species. Shell ornamented by radial and concentric plicae of variable strength and numbers, usually regular and tending to produce a distinctive “‘tile-like” pattern, but sometimes with the radial plicae stronger than the concentric, or vice versa. Along the crest and ventral flank of the concentric plicae are concentric lamellae which are dominant on the posterodorsal flank where the plicae are subdued or absent. Shell thin, of two layers: a thicker, outer prismatic shell layer which may project well beyond the margin of a thinner, inner nacreous shell layer (fibrosa, tegulata). DISCUSSION. The above diagnosis has been made broad to include species of similar external ornament and shape, but either equivalved or inequivalved, and having a range of ligament area and muscula- tion characteristics. In the diagnosis and description species names in parentheses are given after those features where the morphology is known from less than three species. Species included in my broad concept of Tenuipteria are Tenuipteria tegulata (Hagenow, 1842) T. fibrosa (Meek and Hayden, 1856a) T.? caucasica (Dobrov, 1951) T. argentea (Conrad, 1858) T.? dobrovi (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965) 24 POSTILLA As discussed above, fibrosa and caucasica might be conspecific with tegulata and dobrovi with argentea. Because of lack of knowledge of the morphology of their ligament areas, caucasica and dobrovi are tentatively classed in the genus. All species included in Tenuipteria differ from Inoceramus in one or a combination of the internal morphological characteristics. Future work may show that the equivalved species with a few very weak or no ligament pits and a partly continuous pallial line (Tenuipteria tegulata, fibrosa, ?caucasica) should be separated sub- generically or generically from the inequivalved species with irreg- ular, weak ligament pits, strongly inflated umbone and the corre- lated smaller anterior ear and convex anterodorsal margin on the left valve (argentea, ?dobrovi). The Turonian genus Didymotis Gerhardt (1897) has a smooth ligament area lacking pits (Imlay, 1955) and superficially resembles Tenuipteria in shape, ornament and possession of a thin shell. How- ever, the equivalved species of Didymotis are oval in shape, have inconspicuous subcentral umbones and a long, straight dorsal margin, and lack the distinctive regular “‘tile-like” ornament of Tenuipteria. On Didymotis irregular, closely spaced, concentric plicae dominate the few weak, widely spaced, radial plicae that occur only on the main disc of each valve (Gerhardt, 1897, Pl. 5, figs. 3a,b). The morphological differences between the genera, and the reasonable assumption of derivation from different inoceramid stocks at differ- ent times warrant their treatment as separate taxa. The resemblance of Didymotis to Tenuipteria is undoubtedly due to convergence, perhaps dependent on the adoption of a similar mode of life. Tenuipteria fibrosa (Meek and Hayden) (Plate 1, figs. 1-6; Fig. 3a) Avicula? fibrosa Meek and Hayden, 1856a, p. 86-87. Pholadomya fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). Meek and Hayden, 1856b, pi283: Pinna fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). Meek, 1864, p. 9. Avicula (Pseudoptera) fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). Meek, 1873, p. 489. Pteria (Pseudoptera) fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). Meek, 1876, p. INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 25 36-37, Pl. 17, figs. 17a—d. Whitfield, 1880, p. 386, Pl. 7, fig. 5. Whiteaves, 1885, p. 32, Pl. 4, fig. 1. Inoceramus (Actinoceramus) whitii Toepelman, 1922, p. 63. Inoceramus (Actinoceramus) fibrosus (Meek and Hayden). Dobbin and Reeside, 1929, p. 20. Tardinacara (Pseudoptera) fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). Elias, 1931, opp. p. 58, p. 124, p. 130. Searight, 1934, p. 4. Inoceramus (Actinoceramus) fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). Russell, 1940, p. 88. Inoceramus fibrosus (Meek and Hayden). Landes, 1940, p. 136-137. Cobban and Reeside, 1952, p. 1020, and correlation chart. Jeletzky, 1962, p. 1011-1014, Pl. 141, figs. 4-7. Seitz, 1959, p. 123-124 (? synonymous with J. tegulatus Hagenow (1842, p. 559)). Inoceramus radiatus Kellum, 1962, p. 57, Pl. 5, fig. 17 (non Heine, 1929, p. 105, Pl. 18, figs. 68, 69). Inoceramus cobbani Kellum, 1964, p. 1006 (new name for J. radiatus Kellum). Inoceramus? tegulatus Hagenow, 1842 (non Odum, 1922). Jeletzky, in Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965, p. 957. Tenuipteria fibrosa (Meek and Hayden). Speden, 1970, Pl. 8, figs. 11-18; Pl. 9, figs. 1-16. DESCRIPTION. Specimens 5 to 55 mm long, equivalved, inequilateral, maximum inflation about mid-height close to anterior margin. Shape extremely variable, submytiloid to subquadrangular, and rarely al- most oval. Height, anterior length and width are, respectively, 83 to 100, 8 to 15 and 12 to 27 percent of the length of the outline of the inner shell layer. Dorsal margin straight, posterodorsal margin rounded, and the angle subtended at the umbone by the dorsal margin and the line joining the posteroventral extremity is about 40 to 50 degrees. Umbones prosogyrous, sited near the anterior end of the straight dorsal margin, not prominent, project only slightly above the dorsal margin. Anterior auricle distinct, always present, rela- tively small but of variable size, delimited from the moderately to strongly inflexed anterodorsal margin by a narrow groove of variable prominence. When the anterodorsal margin is strongly inturned the associated groove is deep, and there is a distinct byssal notch and gape where the groove meets the margin. Otherwise, the byssal notch and gape are small or indefinite. 26 Ve 255: na POSTILLA PLATE 1 Tenuipteria fibrosa (Meek and Hayden) YPM 24644; ligament area of a left valve. Note the lack of ligament pits. YPM A-1140, Locality 115, Protocardia-Oxytoma Assemblage Zone, Little Eagle lithofacies, Trail City Member, Fox Hills Formation. X1.5. YPM 24033; the divergence of the outer prismatic layer from the inner layer dorsally and strong concentric plicae (2), and the striated ligament area which lacks ligament pits. YPM A-992, Locality 231, Lower nicolleti Assemblage Zone, Little Eagle lithofacies, Trail City Member, Fox Hills Formation. Fig. 2 X1, Fig. 3 X2. . YPM 24039; right valve steinkern with equally strong radial and con- centric plicae. YPM A-336, Locality 32, Mobridge Member, Pierre Sale! xaIE . YPM 24037; right valve steinkern with a posteroventrally situated ad- ductor scar and two anterior byssal-pedal scars on either side of an umbonal fracture. The specimen on which Figure 3a is based. YPM A-3S0, Locality 39, Cucullaea Assemblage Zone, Timber Lake Member, Fox Hills Formation. X6. . YPM 24028; left valve steinkern with strong radial plicae. YPM A-336, Locality 32, Mobridge Member, Pierre Shale. X2. 28 POSTILLA Ornament extremely variable, consisting of concentric and radial plicae usually of equal size and regular and giving a distinctive “tile- like” pattern, but sometimes with stronger radial or concentric plicae. Radial plicae appear at about 5 to 20 mm from the tip of the umbone and are absent only rarely on specimens longer than 20 mm. Radial plicae absent from the posterodorsal flank of the valve where the concentric plicae also weaken and concentric lamellae dominate. A concentric lamella occurs along the crest or along the dorsal part of the ventral flank of each concentric plica. Specimens greater than 30 mm in height have about 15 to 30 radial plicae, which are usually slightly wider than the interspaces, and about 20 to 35 concentric plicae. Some specimens have irregular broad undulations bearing three to four of the regular concentric plicae. Ligament area extends the length of the dorsal margin, inclined at 30 to 40 degrees to the commissural plane, generally strong con- cave and almost semicircular in cross-section, or more rarely L- shaped with a wider, slightly concave dorsal limb and a flat ventral limb inclined at 60 to 80 degrees to the commissural plane. Surface of ligament area marked by fine longitudinal striae separated by much wider shallow grooves; striae stronger on the dorsal part of the ligament area, often weak or absent on the ventral part. Ligament area lacks impressed pits, but rare specimens show traces of faint shallow undulations. In the vicinity of the umbones the dorsal margin usually strongly overhangs the ligament area. Posterior adductor scar large, elliptical to pear-shaped, tapering posterodorsally where deeply impressed at extremity, anterior mar- gin with an indentation of variable prominence, situated at postero- ventral extremity of inner shell layer close to its junction with outer shell layer; rarely preserved. In the umbonal cavity are two antero- dorsal scars (pedal-byssal retractors), a small oval impression ante- rior to the line of maximum inflation and a slightly larger subrectan- gular scar posterior to the line of maximum inflation. Pallial line on inner shell layer close to junction with outer shell layer, consisting of a narrow continuous band with irregularly spaced swellings from the posterior adductor to above mid-height of shell, then continuing as a series of four to eight small discrete oval or linear impressions. Above the anterior pedal-byssal scar and close to the dorsal margin are sometimes seen three to five scars. Calcitostracum very thin and fragile, observed maximum thickness 0.7 mm, rarely exceeds 0.5 mm, composed of a thick, outer prismatic INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP a) layer and a thin, inner pearly nacreous layer one quarter to one sixth of the thickness of the outer layer. Outer layer extends considerably beyond the inner layer, forming a broad flange. Internal surface of the umbonal cavity is marked by fine irregular striae which approxi- mately parallel the growth axis. Many specimens have a faint ridge along a line extending from the dorsal margin posterior to the um- bone to the anterodorsal end of the posterior adductor. TYPE SPECIMEN. Lectotype of Avicula? fibrosa Meek and Hayden, by subsequent designation of Meek (1876, PI. 17, fig. 17a), USNM 460, a steinkern of a right valve, oblique length 34.7 mm. Type locality: Forks of the Cheyenne River, South Dakota. Stratigraphic position: Pierre Shale, Early Maestrichtian, Upper Cretaceous. OCCURRENCE. In the Western Interior of the United States T. fibrosa occurs in the Pierre Shale and Fox Hills Formation and ranges from the Baculites baculus zone through to the top of the Timber Lake Member of the Fox Hills Formation. In the type area of the Fox Hills Formation it is common only in the Lower and Upper nicolleti as- semblage zones (Waage, 1961). In south-central Canada it is known only from the upper part of the Bearpaw Formation (Jeletzky, 1962, p. 1012; and see Furnival, 1946, p. 62). DISCUSSION. The description given above is based on specimens from the Mobridge Member, Pierre Shale, and the Fox Hills Formation in its type area. The reader is referred to Speden (1970) for additional illustrations of specimens of fibrosa and data on occurrence. No ac- count is taken of the morphological variation described for other samples by Cobban (1964). Important features of the morphology of T. fibrosa are discussed below: a) Shape. The variation in shape is marked. A striking feature of complete specimens is that the outline of the outer shell layer does not parallel the outline of the inner shell layer. This divergence is most marked along the posterior and posteroventral margins, while the dorsal margin of the ligament area diverges from the dorsal margin of the inner shell layer by angles of 10 to 25 degrees (PI. 1, fig. 2). The outline of steinkerns is usually defined by the margin of the inner shell layer, and all too frequently the thin outer shell layer breaks off along its junction with the inner layer. Consequently, the 30 POSTILLA shape based on steinkerns, or even shelled specimens, may be false. Tenuipteria fibrosa tends to be more oval than is indicated by the typical mytiloid steinkerns. Because of the wide variation in shape shown by fibrosa, and the nonparallelism of the outlines of the outer and inner shell layers, only gross measurements are given in the above description. b) Ornament. The Fox Hills “populations” are characterized by extremely variable ornament. Normally, the radial and concentric plicae are of almost equal strength, although the concentric ornament is commonly stronger than the finer and more regular radial plicae. Specimens with strong radial sulci, which closely resemble the lecto- type, are present in many collections from all assemblage zones but are more common in the Mobridge Member of the Pierre Shale along the Moreau River (YPM A-336). The radial plicae are very weak on some small specimens, particularly those in collections from the Timber Lake Member, Fox Hills Formation. However, this weak- ness may be related to the factor of size. The pattern of ornament shown by the Fox Hills “populations” covers the third and fourth ‘“‘forms” of Cobban (1964, i.e. those with “concentric and radial sculpture . . . of about equal strength, and a final form in which the concentric sculpture dominates”. It should be stressed that the individual specimens may have very strong or very weak radial plicae. The range of variation of ornament in a single collection at a locality prevents positive placing in either of Cobban’s “forms”, at least until they are more fully documented. Ornament studies ideally should be based on external moulds or the original shell surface and not on steinkerns, which are often all that a paleontologist has to study. In the case of the Fox Hills sam- ples the narrow radial plicae are notably more subdued on the steinkern than on the external mould or shell surface c) Ligament area. The ligament area is basically smooth and lacks the incised, transverse, rectangular ligament pits characteristic of the genus [noceramus. Rare specimens show traces of faint shallow un- dulations on the floor of the ligament area. These, however, are ir- regular and cannot be compared with the ligament pits of Inocera- mus. Odum (1922) records the presence of similar faint undulations on his specimens of 7. tegulata from the White Chalk of Denmark and shows the presence of small ligament pits on the dorsal half of the ligament area of a specimen from M@gens Klint (1922, fig. 6). According to Birkelund (letter of February 2, 1966), the specimen INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 31 with ligament pits from Méens Klint is stratigraphically older than the specimens from Aalborg which lack pits. Small but distinct pits occur on the dorsal part of the ligament area of specimens of Inoceramus cf. barabini Morton (YPM 24452, 24055), labeled as from Converse County, Wyoming, Pierre Shale (Campanian), C. E. Beecher and J. B. Hatcher, collectors, held in the Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, Peabody Museum of Nat- ural History, Yale University. On these specimens the pits are smaller and less definite toward and under the umbones (Speden, 1970). Derivation of the fibrosa type of pitless ligament area by de- generation from a typical Inoceramus ligament area with pits is suggested by these observations. d) Musculation. Musculation is rarely described for species of Inoceramus, largely because of the lack of impression of the scars into the thin shell and the poor preservation of specimens. The ad- ductor scar of fibrosa is also hard to find for the above reasons, and also because it is sited so close to the posteroventral margin of the inner shell layer, a portion of the shell often broken or not collected. A search of the literature indicates that the musculation of species classed in Inoceramus consists characteristically of a pallial line of discrete scars and a posterior adductor scar sited in a submedial posi- tion (see Jones and Gryc, 1960, p. 159). Kauffman (1965) has recently recognized three types of muscle scar patterns in Cretaceous species of Inoceramus. One category includes that of T. fibrosa as described above. Other Upper Cretaceous “Jnoceramus’’ species have a musculation pattern similar to that of fibrosa, but with a pallial line consisting solely of discrete scars and generally with small scars extending in a line across the posterodorsal part of the shell. A specimen (YPM 24052) of the “Inoceramus” barabini complex and two specimens (YPM 24053) labeled “Endocostea typica Whitf.”, all from ‘““Converse County, Wyoming, Pierre Shale”, C. E. Beecher and J. B. Hatcher, collectors, have this type of pattern (Figs. 3b,c; see also Speden, 1970). Species of recent isognomiid genera (Isognomon, Melina) have a very similar pattern of muscle scars, with two small byssal-pedal scars in an anterodorsal position, but the large adductor scar is usually in a more subcentral position on the inner shell layer and is joined to the anterior of the two anterodorsal scars by a line of discrete small pallial scars. The possession of similar musculation patterns supports the close relationship between the isognomiid and 32 POSTILLA inoceramid stocks postulated on stratigraphic and other morpholog- ical grounds by many workers (Cox, 1940; Hayami. 1960). In the case of fibrosa the resemblance is probably secondary and due to convergence through the adoption by an inoceramid stock of an epi- faunal mode of life similar to that of Jsognomon. COMPARISONS. Seitz (1959) suspected that T. tegulata Hagenow (not of @dum) might be synonymous with T. caucasica Dobrov and T. fibrosa Meek and Hayden, but he stressed the need for further study of better preserved and more abundant specimens before his pro- posed synonymies could be accepted as valid. Jeletzky (1962), using the concept of tegulata Hagenow as an inequivalved species, syn- onymized caucasica Dobrov with fibrosa Meek and Hayden. In 1965 Jeletzky (Jeletzky and Clemens, 1965) accepted tegulata Hagenow as being an equivalved, morphologically variable species and synony- mized fibrosa and caucasica under tegulata Hagenow. Seitz considered that T. fibrosa differs from T. tegulata Hagenow in having growth lamellae which are convex ventrally across the raised nodular radial plicae, whereas they are convex dorsally on T. tegula- ta. On specimens of fibrosa from the Fox Hills Formation, South Dakota, the growth lamellae and striae may be concave or convex dorsally across the raised radial plicae, and an individual lamella may have both orientations along its length On most specimens the sec- ond order concentric costate ornament has a straight or slightly con- vex ventral trace. Only on specimens where a very nodular pattern is produced by strong radial and concentric plicae do the lamellae have a convex dorsal trace. The growth lamellae on specimens of T. dobrovi available to me have an irregular trace, while a specimen of T. tegulata (the original of @dum, 1922, fig. 5) does not show clearly the concentric lamellate ornament across the radial plicae on the main disc of the valve. On the posterodorsal flank the lamellae are irregularly undulating. Although the difference between tegulata Hagenow and fibrosa noted by Seitz is unlikely to be of specific rank, additional data on the consistency of orientation of the trace of these lamellae across the radial plicae are required to confirm my opinion. The few specimens and illustrations of tegulata Hagenow and caucasica available to the writer indicate, as suggested by Seitz (1959) and Jeletzky and Clemens (1965), that the three equivalved species tegulata, fibrosa and caucasica might be synonymous. The three “species” include forms with a wide variation of shape and INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 33 similar ornament. Specimens of fibrosa greater than 30 mm in height have about 15 to 30 radial raised plicae and about 20 to 35 concentric plicae (see p. 28). @dum’s (1922, fig. 5) specimen of segulata Hagenow has an indefinite number of radial plicae and about 25 concentric plicae, while those of caucasica figured by Dobrov (1951) have about 10 to 30 radial and 20 to 35 concentric plicae. Cobban (1964), in his recognition of his ornament groups, has emphasized the variation in strength of radial and concentric plicae. Our present knowledge is insufficient to permit the synonymizing of the three species. Detailed studies are required of the stratigraphic and biogeographic variation of adequate samples of the European species such as are being undertaken by Cobban (1964) for the North American 7. fibrosa. Tenuipteria argentea (Conrad) (Plate 2, fig. 7; Plate 3, figs. 1-6) Inoceramus argenteus Conrad, 1858, p. 329, Pl. 34, fig. 16. Inoceramus costellatus Conrad, 1858, p. 329, Pl. 34, fig. 12. Inoceramus argenteus Conrad. Stephenson and Monroe, 1940, p. 280, Pl. 10, figs. 8, 9. Tenuipteria argentea (Conrad). Stephenson, 1955, p. 111, Pl. 16, figs. 4-9. REDESCRIPTON. Species of moderate size, specimens from about 10 to 65 mm long, inequilateral, inequivalved, umbones prosogyrous. Right valve slightly to moderately inflated, the umbone barely projecting above the dorsal margin, the anterior auricle small and distinct. Left valve strongly inflated with a prominent umbone pro- jecting above the dorsal margin, anterior auricle small. Posterodorsal margin of each valve rounded. Valves ornamented by radial plicae, strongest on the right valve, which divide by gemmation on the center of the disc, become wider ventrally and are separated by narrower interspaces Radial plicae number about 25 to 30 on the left valve (N = 4) and 26 to 33 on the right valve (N = 4). Posterodorsal third of the shell and the antero- dorsal margin lack radial plicae. Radial plicae crossed by regular weak concentric plicae which are accentuated by a prominent growth 34 1, POSTILLA PLATE 2 Tenuipteria tegulata (Hagenow) 2, 3. MMH 1816; the original of @dum, 1922, fig. 5, a left valve steinkern with shell dorsally showing anterior ear, slightly projecting umbone, and a longitudinally striated ligament area which lacks ligament pits. Aalborg, Lower Maestrichtian. (Plaster cast NZGS-WM 8956). Figs. 1, 2 X3; Fig. 3 X1. Tenuipteria dobrovi (Jeletzky) . MMH 1814; poorly preserved left valve, the original of @dum, 1922, figs. 1, 2. “Dania” at Mariager, Upper Maestrichtian. (Plastic cast NZGS-— WM 8957). X1. . MMH collection 1965/694; left valve steinkern. Limhamn, Scania, Sweden, Upper Maestrichtian. X1. . MMH collection 1965/693; left valve steinkern. Limhamn, Scania, Sweden, Upper Maestrichtian. (Plaster casts NZGS-WM 9238). X1. Tenuipteria argentea (Conrad) . USNM Cat. No. 159947; left valve, incomplete. Topotype, USGS Locality 707, USNM 20661, Owl Creek, Mississippi, Maestrichtian. X2. 36 POSTILLA PLATE 3 Tenuipteria argentea (Conrad) 1. USNM Cat. No. 159948; an incomplete bivalved specimen. X1.5. 2. USNM Cat. No. 159949; right valve showing lack of radial plicae on the posterior flank. X1.5. 3. USNM Cat. No. 159947; left valve ligament area showing weak ligament pits. X2. 4. USNM Cat. No. 159948; left valve of specimen of Figure 1. X1.5. 5, 6. USNM Cat. No. 159950; right valve showing ornament and ligament area with more strongly incised ligament pits and distinct anterior auricle. Bige Sel. 3. Fig? 6eX3. All specimens are topotypes from USGS Locality 707, USNM collection 20661, Owl Creek, Mississippi, Owl Creek Formation, Maestrichtian. iy BRE, 38 POSTILLA lamella developed along the crest of each plica. Concentric plicae closely spaced on umbonal 10 mm of shell, on the dorsal flanks and along the ventral margins of adult specimens, but number about one per millimeter on the main disc of the shell. The intersection of radial and concentric plicae produces a distinctive tile-like pattern of shal- low rectangular depressions. Ligament area more or less flat, bearing two to five shallow sub- rectangular or subtrigonal ligament pits; that under the umbone the largest, and sometimes consisting of two fused pits. Pits and inter- spaces crossed by fine striae extending the length of the ligament area. Ligament area of the right valve inclined at about 20 to 30 degrees to the plane of the commissure, and that of the left valve inclined at about 60 to 80 degrees Muscle scars unknown. Shell very thin; shell of the main disc at- taining a maximum thickness of about 0.5 mm, consisting of a thick, inner nacreous lamellar layer (0.4 mm) and a very thin, outer pris- matic layer (0.1 mm). TYPE SPECIMEN. Neotype, USNM 124102, here designated, a topo- typic left valve shell showing the ligament area, the original of Plate 16, figure 6 of Stephenson (1955), USGS 6464. Type locality: Owl Creek, three miles northeast of Ripley, Tippah County, Missis- sippi (E 1% Sec. 7, T.4 S, R.4 E). Stratigraphic position: Owl Creek Formation, Maestrichtian. Stephenson (1955) presumed that the holotype was lost, and this was confirmed subsequently by Richards (1968). Conrad (1858) did not record the number of species he studied, but apparently no syn- types are present in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sci- ences, Philadelphia. Consequently, one of the topotypic specimens studied by Stephenson when he established the genus is selected as a neotype. DISCUSSION. The above redescription is based on the examination of about 60 specimens, mostly incomplete and slightly crushed, in collections held by the United States National Museum, catalogue numbers USGS 6875 (N=6), USNM 20612 (N=22) and USNM 20661 (N=31), kindly forwarded to the writer by the courtesy of Dr. Erle G. Kauffman. Measurements taken from the best specimens in these collections are given in Table 1. Because the measurements are based on the outline of the inner shell layer they should be accepted with caution. INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 39 TABLE 1. Measurements of specimens (in mm) of Tenuipteria argentea (Conrad). Length of Half Anterior dorsal No. Valve Length Height width length margin DUPM* USNM 20661 right a 32 7.0 4.6 = — es left 29) 30 14.0 3.0 18 4.5 ~ left 65 62 14.0 15.0 41 — left 15 13 2.0 2.5 12 — Bs right ra | 26 7.0 4.0 18 — ‘a right 25 DS 6.0 5.0 22 = 20612 left 39 42 18.5 6.0 28 6.5 < right 40 41 10.0 6.0 — — USGS 6875 right 31 28 5.0 6.0 24 — 3 right 49 45 7.0 9.0 33 — *Distance the umbone of the left valve projects above the dorsal margin ligament area. of the COMPARISONS. Dobrov (1951, p. 164) was the first to suggest the presence in the latest Cretaceous of North America of the in- equivalved group of “Jnoceramus tegulatus”. Tenuipteria dobrovi Jeletzky (1965) externally closely resembles T. argentea in having a strongly inflated left valve and a flattish right valve, with both valves ornamented by regular to subregular radial and concentric plicae and concentric lamellae. Examination of specimens of Tenuipteria argentea in three col- lections held by the United States National Museum, Washington (catalogue numbers USGS 6875 and USNM 20612 and 20661), three left valves of T. dobrovi from the late Maestrichtian of Den- mark, and illustrations indicates that the valves of these species are very similar in size and shape. Each species has left valves with height to length ratios of about one. Tenuipteria argentea has height to length and half width to length ratios for left valves of 0.87 to 1.14 (N = 5) and 0.22 to 0.47 (N = 3), respectively; for T.? dobrovi the ratios are 1.00 to 1.20 (N = 3) and 0.23 to 0.34 (N = 4), re- spectively. Because of the inadequate numbers of specimens these values can be taken only as an indication of similarity. On both T. argentea and dobrovi the radial plicae are most dis- tinct on the central and anterior part of the valve and are weak or lacking on the broad posterior ear. Replicas of two left valves of dobrovi from the Maestrichtian of Denmark, NZGS—WM 8957 (the 40 POSTILLA original of @dum, 1922, figs. 1, 2; height = 46 mm; PI. 2, fig. 4) and NZGS-WM (height 43 mm; PI. 2, fig. 6), have 17 and 23 radial plicae and about 37 and 29 concentric plicae, respectively. Photo- graphs of a left and a right valve of argentea figured by Stephenson (1966, Pl. 16, figs. 4, 6) suggest the presence of about 18 radial plicae; the concentric plicae could not be counted. Topotypes of argentea from Owl Creek, Mississippi, in collection Cat. No. 20661 held by the U.S. National Museum, have 25 to 30 radial plicae on the left valve (N — 4) and 26 to 33 on the right valve (N = 4). These valves, which are 20 to 41 mm high, have about one concentric plica per millimeter on the main disc, i.e. about 25 to 45 per valve. The close external similarity of T. dobrovi and argentea suggests that they may be conspecific and congeneric. However, the ligament area of dobrovi has not been described or illustrated. Until the inter- nal morphology of dobrovi and the external morphology of both species are more fully known, the synonymy of the two species is uncertain though possible. LITERATURE CITED Aliev, M. M., 1958, Inotseramy melovykh otlozhenii SSSR: Akad. Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSSR Izv., 1957, no. 3, p. 47-61. (Reprinted in Inter- nat. Geol. Cong., 20th, Mexico 1956, sec. 7, Paleontologia, taxonomia y evolucion, p. 123-137 [1958]). Aliev, R. A. 1960, K Paleontologicheskoy Kharakteristike Verkhnego Mela Yugo-Vostochnogo Kavkaza [The paleontological characteristics of the Upper Cretaceous in South-east Caucasus]: Akad. Nauk SSSR Doklady, v. 131(2), p. 378-379. (Am. Geol. Inst. translation, 1961, p. 295—296a). Birkelund, Tové, 1957, Upper Cretaceous belemnites from Denmark: Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk., Biol. Skr., v. 9, no. 1, 69 p., 6 pls. 1965, Ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous of West Greenland: Meddelelser om Gr6nland, v. 179, no. 7, 192 p., 48 pls. 1966, Die Entwicklung der jiingsten Scaphiten und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung Gebiet: Deutsche geol. Gesell. Ber. [Berlin], Wiss. A, Geologie Palaontologie, v. 11, no. 6, p. 737-744. Briggs, J. C., 1967, Dispersal of tropical marine shore animals: Coriolis param- eters or competition: Nature, v. 216, no. 5113, p. 350. Cieslinski, Stefan, 1960, Biostratygrafia i zasieg form przewodrich g6rnej kredy W Polsce [Biostratigraphy and extent of index forms in the Upper Cretaceous of Poland]: Kwartalnik geologiczny [Warsaw], v. 4, no. 2, p. 432-441. (English summary) Cobban, W. A., 1964, Evolution of two Upper Cretaceous mollusks, in U.S. Geol. Survey Mem., Paleontologia Indica, ser. 9, v. 3, pt. 3, 157 p., ——— and Reeside, J. B., Jr., 1952, Correlation of the Cretaceous forma- INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 41 tions of the western interior of the United States: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 63, p. 1011-1043. Conrad, T. A., 1858, Observations on a group of Cretaceous Fossil Shells, found in Tippah County, Miss., with descriptions of fifty-six new species: Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Jour., ser. 2, v. 3, p. 323-336, pls. 34, 35. Cox, L. R., 1940, The Jurassic lamellibranch fauna of Kuchh (Cutch): India Geol. Survey Mem., Paleontologia Indica, ser. 9, v. 3, pt. 3, 157 p., 10 pls. 1955, Proposed determination of the nominal species to be accepted as the type species of the genus “Jnoceramus” Sowerby (J.), 1814 (Class Pelecypoda) and proposed addition of that name to the “Official list of generic names in Zoology”: Zool. Nomenclature Bull., v. 11, p. 239-245. Dobbin, C. E., and Reeside, J. B., Jr., 1929, The contact of the Fox Hills and Lance formations: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 158, p. 9-25. Dobrov, S. A., 1951, Gruppa Inoceramus caucasicus sp. n.—Inoceramus tegulatus Hag. na severnam kavhaze: Pamiati Akademika A. D. Arkhan- gels’kogo Voprosy Litologii i Stratigrafii SSR, Moscow, Press Acad. Sci. SSSR, p. 163-172, 2 pls. and Pavlova, M. M., 1959, Inoceramy, in Moskvin, M. M., ed., Atlas verkhnemelovai fauny severnogo Kavkaza i Kryma: Moscow, State Sci.-Tech. Press Oil and Mining-Fuel Literature, p. 130-165, pls. 1-23. Ebensberger, Hans, 1962, Stratigraphische und mikropalaontologische Unter- suchungen in der Aachener Oberkreide, besonders der Maastricht-Stufe: Palaeontographica, v. 120, Abt. A, p. 1-120, 12 pls. Elias, M. K., 1931, The geology of Wallace County, Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Bull. 18, 254 p. Furnival, G. M., 1946, Cypress Lake map-area, Saskatchewan: Canada Geol. Survey Mem. 242, 161 p. Gerhardt, K., 1897, Beitrage zur kenntniss der Kreideformation in Columbien: Neues Jahrb. Mineralogie, Geologie, Palaontologie, Beilage-Bande 11, p. 118-208. Gill, J. R., and Cobban, W. A., 1966, The Red Bird section of the Upper Cretaceous Pierre Shale in Wyoming: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 393—A, 73 p. Hagenow, F. von, 1842, Monographie der Rtigen’schen Kreide-Versteinerun- gen. III. Abtheilung: Mollusken: Neues Jahrb., Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie, Petrefakten-Kunde, Jahrg. 1842, p. 528-575, 9 pls. Hattin, D. E., 1967, Stratigraphic and paleoecologic significance of macro- invertebrate fossils in the Dakota Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Kansas, in Teichurt, C. and Yochelson, E. L., eds., Essays on paleon- tology and stratigraphy: Lawrence, Univ. Kansas Press, p. 571-589. Hayami, Itaru, 1960, Jurassic inoceramids in Japan: Tokyo Univ., Fac. Sci., Voie, Sx, A, We Ns jolts 4, jos BIE SPs Heine, Friedrich, 1929, Die Inoceramen des Mittelwestfalischen Emschers und Unteren Untersenons: Preuss. geol. Landesanstalt Abh., n.s. 120, 124 p., 20 pls. Heinz, Rudolph, 1932, Aus der neuen Systematik der Inoceramen. Beitrage 42 POSTILLA zur Kenntnis der Inoceramen 14: Mineralog.-Geol. Staatsinst. Hamburg Mitt. 13, p. 1-26. Imlay, R. W., 1955, Stratigraphic and geographic range of the Late Cretaceous pelecypod Didymotis: Jour. Paleontology, v. 29, p. 548-550. Jeletzky, J. A., 1948, Zur Kenntnis der Oberkreide der Dnjepr-Donez-Senke und zum Vergleich der russischen borealen Oberkreide mit derjenigen Polens und Nordwesteuropas: Geol. foren. Stockholm Forh., v. 70, no. 4, p. 583-602. 1951, Die stratigraphie und Belemnitenfauna des Obercampanan und Maastricht Westfalens, Nordwestdeutschlands und Déanemarks sowie einige allgemeine Gliederungs — Probleme der jiingeren borealen Ober- kreide Eurasiens: Beihefte Geol. Jahrb. [Hannover], no. 1, 142 p. 1958, Die jiingere Oberkreide (Oberconiac bis Maastricht) Siidwest- russlands und ihr Vergleich mit der Nordwest = und Westeuropas: Bei- hefte Geol. Jahrb. [Hannover] no. 33, 157 p. 1960, Youngest marine rocks in western interior of North America and the age of the Triceratops-beds, with remarks on comparable dino- saur-bearing beds outside North America: Internat. Geol. Cong., 21st, Copenhagen 1960, Rept., part 5, p. 25-40. 1962, The allegedly Danian dinosaur-bearing rocks of the globe and the problem of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic boundary: Jour. Paleontology, v. 36, p. 1005-1018. and Clemens, W. A., 1965, Comments on Cretaceous Eutheria, Lance Scaphites, and Inoceramus? ex gr. tegulatus: Jour. Paleontology, v. 39, p. 952-959. Jones, D. L., and Gryc, George, 1960, Upper Cretaceous pelecypods of the genus /noceramus from northern Alaska: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 334_E, p. 149-165. Kauffman, E. G., 1965, Taxonomic, ecologic, and evolutionary significance of interior shell morphology in the Inoceramidae (Mesozoic Bivalvia): Geol. Soc. America Spec. Paper 87, Abstracts for 1965, p. 86 [1966]. Kellum, L. B., 1962, Upper Cretaceous Mollusca from Niobrara County, Ne Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, Letters, Papers 1961, v. 47, p. 7-81. 1964, Inoceramus cobbani, new name for Inoceramus radiatus Kel- lum, 1962: Jour. Paleontology, v. 38, p. 1006. Kongiel, Roman, 1962, On belemnites from Maastrichtian, Campanian and Santonian sediments of the Middle Vistula valley (Central Poland): Lr ag Ziemi Prace, Prace Paleozoologiczne [Warsaw], no. 5, 148 p., 21 pls. Landes, R. W., 1940, Geology of the southern Alberta Plains. Part 2. Paleon- tology of the marine formations of the Montana Group: Canada Geol. Survey Mem. 221, p. 129-217, pls. 1-8. Maslakova, N. I., 1959, The Upper Cretaceous deposits of the Rocky Region of the Crimea: Moskovskoe Obschestvo Ispytatelei Prirody Bull., n.s., Otdel Geologisckii, v. 34, no. 4, p. 67-76. (English summary) Meek, F. B., 1864, Check list of the invertebrate fossils of North America. Cretaceous Formation. Notes and explanations: Smithsonian Misc. Colln., Vi-15(p.. 1-26: 31-38 INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS SPECIES GROUP 43 1873, Preliminary paleontological report, consisting of lists and descriptions of fossils, with remarks on the ages of the rocks in which they were found, etc.: U.S. Geol. Survey Terr., 6th Ann. Rept., 1872, p. 429-518. 1876, A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the Upper Missouri country: U.S. Geol. Survey Terr. Rept. v. 9, 629 p., 44 pls. and Hayden, F. V., 1856a, Descriptions of twenty-eight new species of Acephala and one gasteropod, from the Cretaceous formations of Nebraska Territory: Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Proc., v. 8, p. 81-87. 1856b, Descriptions of new fossil species of Mollusca collected by Dr. F. V. Hayden, in Nebraska Territory; together with a complete catalogue of all the remains of Invertebrata hitherto described and identified from the Cretaceous and Tertiary formations of that region: Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Proc., v. 8, p. 265-286. Moskvin, M. M., 1962, [Upper Cretaceous sediments of the North Caucasus and Subcaucasia]: Acta Geol. Polonica, v. 12, p. 159-199. (English summary, p. 191-199) and Naidin, D. P., 1959, Stratigraphie du Crétacé Supérieur de la plate-forme russe, de la Crimée et du Caucase du Nord: Cong. Soc. Savantes Paris, 84th Cong., Dijon, Comptes rendus, Colloque sur le Crétacé Supérieur Frangais, p. 497-522. Naidin, D. P., 1952, Wierchniemielowyje belemnity Zapadnoj Ukrainy: Mos- kovskoe Geol.-Rasw. Inst. Ordzonikidze Trudy, v. 37. (In Russian) 1954, Niekotoryje osobiennosti rasprostranienija u predielach Jew- ropy wierchniemielowych belemnitow: Moskovskoe Obschestvo Ispy- tatelei Prirody Bull., n.s., Otdel Geologisckii, v. 29, no. 3, p. 19-28. 1960, The stratigraphy of the upper Cretaceous of the Russian plat- form: Stockholm Contr. Geol., v. 6, p. 39-61. Nestler, Helmut, 1965, Die Rekonstruktion des Lebensraumes der Rugener Schreibkreide-Fauna (Unter-Maastricht) mit Hilfe der PalaoGkologie und Paladobiologie: Geologie, Jahrg. 14, Beih. 49, 147 p. @dum, Hilmar, 1922, Inoceramus tegulatus v. Hag. det danske Skrivekridt: Dansk. geol. Foren. Medd., v. 6, no. 10, p. 1-13. (English summary) 1953, Die Geologiska Resultaten Fran Borrningarna vid HOllviken. Del 5: The macro-fossils of the Upper Cretaceous: Sveriges geol. under- sokning, ser. C, Arsb. 46, no. 3, 37 p., 4 pls. Pozaryski, W., 1938, Stratygrafia senonuw przelomie Wisly Rachowem i Pulawami (Senonsstratigraphie im Durchbruch der Weichsel zwischen Rachéw und Palawy in Mittelpolen): Geol. Inst. Pologne, Warsaw, Bull. 6, 94 p. 1960, An outline of stratigraphy and palaeogeography of the Cre- taceous in the Polish Lowland: Geol. Inst. Pologne, Warsaw, Pub., v. 30, part 2, p. 377-440. (English summary, p. 430-440). Reeside, J. B., Jr., 1957, Paleoecology of the Cretaceous seas of the western interior of the United States, in Hedgpeth, J. W., ed., Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology: Geol. Soc. America Mem. 67, v. 2, p. 505-541. Richards, H. G., 1968, Catalogue of invertebrate fossil types at the Academy or POSTILLA of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia: Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Spec. PubsS,.222 1p: Russell, L. S., 1940, Geology of the southern Alberta Plains. Part 1. Stratig- raphy and structure: Canada Geol. Survey Mem. 221, p. 1-128. Schmid, Friedrich, 1955, Die bisherigen Untersuchungen iiber das Unter/ Obermaastricht — Grenzprofil von Hemmoor (Niederelbe), seine Schicht- folge und leitformen: Geol. Staatsinst. Hamburg Mitt. 24, p. 75-86. Searight, W. V., 1934, The Stoneville coal area: South Dakota Geol. Survey Rept. Inv. 22, 20 p. Seitz, Otto, 1959, Vergleichende Stratigraphie der Oberkreide in Deutschland und in Nordamerika mit Hilfe der Inoceramen: In:ernat. Geol. Cong., 20th, Mexico 1956, El Sistema Cretacico, Symposium, v. 1, p. 113-129. 1961, Die Inoceramen des Santon von Nordwestdeutschland, I Teil. (Die Untergattungen Platyceramus, Cladioceramus und Cordiceramus): Beih. Geol. Jahrb., v. 46, 186, p., 15 pls. Sohl, N. F., 1960, Archeogastropoda, Mesogastropoda and stratigraphy of the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff formations: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 331—A, p. 1—151. 1964, Neogastropoda, Opisthobranchia and Basommatophora from the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff formations: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 331-B, p. 153-334. and Kauffman, E. G., 1964, Giant Upper Cretaceous oysters from the Gulf Coast and Caribbean: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 483-H, p. H1—H22. Sowerby, J., 1814, Anonymous notice: Annals Philosophy, v. 4, p. 448. Speden, I. G., 1970, The type Fox Hills Formation, Cretaceous (Mae- strichtian), South Dakota. Part 2, Systematics of the Bivalvia: Peabody Mus. Nat. History, Yale Univ., Bull. 33 (in press). Stephenson, L. W., 1941, The larger invertebrate fossils of the Navarro group of Texas exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido formation: Texas Univ. Pub. 4101, 641 p., 95 pls. 1955, Owl Creek (Upper Cretaceous) fossils from Crowleys Ridge, southeastern Missouri: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 274-E, p. 97-140. and Monroe, W. H. 1940, The Upper Cretaceous deposits (Missis- sippi): Mississippi State Geol. Survey Bull. 40, 296 p., 15 pls. and Reeside, J. B., Jr., 1938, Comparison of Upper Cretaceous deposits of Gulf region and Western Interior region: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 22, p. 1629-1638. , King, P. B., Monroe, W. H., and Imlay, R. W., 1942, Correlation of the outcropping Cretaceous formations of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain and Trans-Pecos Texas: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 53, p. 435-448. Stoll, N. R. et al., 1964, International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XI International Congress of Zoology: London, Internat. 7 Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, 176 p. loepelman, W. C., 1922, The paleontology of the area, in Ward, Freeman, The geology of a portion of the Badlands: South Dakota Geol. Nat. His- tory Survey Bull. 11, p. 62-73. lroelsen, J. C., 1937, Om den stratigrafiske inddeling af skrivekridtet i Dan- mark: Dansk. geol. Féren. Medd., v. 9, p. 260-263. INOCERAMUS? TEGULATUS. SPECIES GROUP 45 Vokes, H. E., 1967, Genera of the Bivalvia: A systematic and bibliographic catalogue: Am. Paleontology Bull., v. 51, no. 232. Waage, K. M., 1961, The Fox Hills Formation in its type area, central South Dakota, in Symposium on Late Cretaceous rocks: Wyoming Geol. Assoc. Guidebook 16th Ann. Field Conference, p. 229-240. 1968, The type Fox Hills Formation (Maestrichtian), South Dakota. Part 1. Stratigraphy and paleoenvironments: Peabody Mus. Nat. History, Yale Univ., Bull. 27, 175 p. Whiteaves, J. F., 1885, Report on the Invertebrata of the Laramie and Creta- ceous rocks of the vicinity of the Bow and Belly rivers and adjacent localities in the Northwest Territory: Canada Geol. Survey, Nat. History Survey, Contr. Canadian Paleontology, y. 1, p. 1-89, 11 pls. Whitfield, R. P., 1880, Paleontological report on the fossils collected by the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Black Hills, in Newton, Henry, and Jenney, W. P., Report on the geology and re- sources of the Black Hills of Dakota: Washington, Govt. Printing Office, p. 329-468, pls. 1-16. Williams, G. D., and Burk, C. F., 1964, Upper Cretaceous, in McCrossan, R. G., Glaister, R. P., et al., Geological history of Western Canada: Alberta Soc. Petroleum Geologists, Calgary, p. 169-189. Wolansky, Dora, 1932, Die Cephalopoden und Lamellibranchiaten der Ober- Kreide Pommerns: Univ. Griefswald Geol.-Palaont. Inst. Abh., v. 9, 72 p. Wood, C. J., 1967, Some new observations on the Maastrichtian Stage in the British Isles: Geol. Survey Great Britain Bull., no. 27, p. 271-288. REVIEW SiyEE FORM Telia eS ABSTRACT NOMENCLATURE ILLUSTRATIONS FOOTNOTES TABLES REFERENCES UTHOR'S COPIES PROOF COPYRIGHT INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS The Publications Committee of the Peabody Museum of Natural History reviews and approves manuscripts for publication. Papers will be published in approximately the order in which they are accepted; delays may result if manuscript or illustrations are not in proper form. To facilitate review, the original and one carbon or xerox copy of the typescript and figures should be submitted. The author should keep a copy. Authors of biological papers should follow the Style Manual for Biological Journals, Second Edition (Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci.). Authors of paleontological manuscripts may choose to follow the Sugges- tions to Authors of the Reports of the U.S. Geological Survey, Fifth Edition (U.S. Govt. Printing Office). Maximum size is 80 printed pages including illustrations (= about 100 manuscript pages including illustrations). Manuscripts must be typewritten, with wide margins, on one side of good quality 81% x 11” paper. Double space everything. Do not underline anything except genera and species. The editors reserve the right to adjust style and form for conformity. Should be precise and short. Title should include pertinent key words which will facilitate computerized listings. Names of new taxa are not to be given in the title. The paper must begin with an abstract. Authors must submit com- pleted BioAbstract forms; these can be obtained from the Postilla editors in advance of submission of the manuscripts. Follow the International Codes of Zoological and Botanical Nomen- clature. Must be planned for reduction to 4 x 614” (to allow for running head and two-line caption). If illustration must go sideways on page, reduction should be to 334 x 634”. All illustrations should be called “Figures” and numbered in arabic, with letters for parts within one page. It is the author’s responsibility to see that illustra- tions are properly lettered and mounted. Captions should be typed double-spaced on a separate page. Should not be used, with rare exceptions. If unavoidable, type double-spaced on a separate page. Should be numbered in arabic. Each must be typed on a separate page. Horizontal rules should be drawn lightly in pencil; vertical rules must not be used. Tables are expensive to set and correct; cost may be lowered and errors prevented if author submits tables typed with electric typewriter for photographic reproduction. The style manuals mentioned above must be followed for form and for abbreviations of periodicals. Double space. Each author receives 50 free copies of his Postilla. Additional copies may be ordered at cost by author when he returns galley proof. All copies have covers. Author receives galley proof and manuscript for checking printer’s errors, but extensive revision cannot be made on the galley proof. Corrected galley proof and manuscript must be returned to editors within seven days. Any issue of Postilla will be copyrighted by Peabody Museum of Natural History only if its author specifically requests it. 3 2044 066 305 277 Date Due ‘et o~! oP, OUD RUE EE te ST 5. debs geiel tre PLE Kee yynuceers GAG ee rE TIES BST Ee Sra ceebgree e : . rte BASEN Sw age © ae ewer eres os ee Rake noe ea a . he th aise Aone arte ’ ; Rtas , : : woes ro ; ree ya aee ts ets ; = ss ie Peet e's